Banking on bitcoin netflix

Banking on Bitcoin

www.netflix.com

This is a documentary on Bitcoin which is available on Netflix. The post talks a lot about Bitcoin and how to bank with it. It is under the genres; Documentaries, Social and Cultural documents. It was documented by Christopher Cannucciari.

The time lapse for the movie is 1 hour, 23 minutes and was released in 2017 with a 13 + parental guidance. The documentary contains many interviews with Bitcoin enthusiasts as well as experts. A clear history about Bitcoin was mentioned and its plans for the future alongside the technology it operates on.

There are more details on Banking on Bitcoin movie such as the download details, the scene type (provocative), language and subtitles (English and English/Arabic respectively). There are other movies on the site which talks about cryptocurrencies.

Some of these crypto movies and TV shows are;

2. Betting on Zero

5. Steve Jobs Billion Dollar Hippy and many others.

Also, there are other upcoming movies on the site which are not crypto-based but displayed for users of Netflix. Banking with Bitcoin is our main priority and you can understand everything you need to when you download the movie from the site.

Features of Banking Bitcoin

1. Time limit: It is time-effective because it doesn’t take too much of your time before you understand how Bitcoin works in the bank.

2. Interviews: The movie also contains interviews with respectable people that understand Bitcoin.

Источник

Компания Netflix следующей купит Биткоин?

Венчурный капиталист-миллиардер Тим Дрейпер предсказывает, что Netflix станет следующей компанией из списка Fortune 500, которая инвестирует в Биткоин.

Тим Дрейпер — один из первых приверженцев Биткоин, осознавший потенциал децентрализованных технологий и их дефицит, особенно после взлома Mt.Gox. Дрейпер утверждал, что новости о взломе Mt. Gox, крупнейшей биржи Биткоин в то время, привел к падению цены ведущей криптовалюты почти на 30%, однако цена восстановилась вскоре после этого, и Дрейпер осознал потенциал, который имеет валюта как класс активов.

Дрейпер, известный крипто-энтузиаст и поклонник Биткоин, заявил, что, управляя финансами корпоративного гиганта, он бы рассматривал BTC как потенциальную защиту от множества вещей.

«Если я являюсь финансовым директором одной из этих крупных организаций, я говорю: «Мы должны владеть X% в Биткоин», потому что это защита от того, что другая валюта станет валютой будущего, а также защита от инфляции, поскольку правительства продолжают печатать все больше своих забавных долларов».

Основатель Draper Associates говорит, что генеральный директор Netflix Рид Хастингс подходит под профиль человека, который может решить включить Биткоин на баланс своей компании.

«Вы знаете, кто это может быть? Netflix. Я думаю, что Рид Гастингс — очень новаторский парень с творческим мышлением, и я думаю, что он все еще контролирует господство в Netflix».

Дрейпер уверен, что организации все чаще и неизбежно будут вскакивать на борт Биткоин-поезда, поскольку они ищут способы выполнить свои фидуциарные обязанности.

Дрейпера оценивает Биткоин, как актив стоимостью в $ 250 000 за монету. Еще год назад эти предсказания казались почти смехотворными, теперь же все больше людей склоняется к тому, что это вполне возможно. Венчурный капиталист-миллиардер стал ярым поклонником Биткоин после покупки значительной суммы, конфискованной на темном веб-рынке Silk Road. На момент покупки ведущий крипто-актив стоил несколько сотен долларов за штуку.

Подписывайтесь на Телеграм канал, чтобы всегда быть в курсе самых последних и горячих новостей @like_freedman

Источник

Тим Дрейпер: Netflix и Amazon станут следующими крупными инвесторами в биткоин

Стриминговый сервис Netflix приобретет первую криптовалюту в рамках политики по управлению резервами, а онлайн-ритейлер Amazon добавит ее в качестве платежной опции. Такое мнение представил венчурный инвестор и сторонник цифрового золота Тим Дрейпер.

В феврале Tesla стала первой компанией из списка индекса S&P 500, которая приобрела биткоин. Инвестиции составили $1,5 млрд.

«Вы знаете кто следующий? Это Netflix. [CEO] Рид Хастингс — новатор с творческим мышлением…я думаю, что его компания — очевидный претендент из списка Fortune 100», — предположил Дрейпер.

В ходе интервью миллиардер допустил «скорое» добавление биткоина в качестве платежного средства компанией Amazon. Он пояснил, что клиенты онлайн-ритейлера на протяжении многих лет покупают товары опосредованно при помощи криптовалют.

В феврале стало известно о поиске Amazon разработчиков для создания решения по конвертации фиата в цифровую валюту.

В одном из сериалов Netflix о будущем в качестве платежного средства выступили криптовалюты.

Недавно Илон Маск назвал вложения Tesla в первую криптовалюту «достаточно рискованными». Аналитики Wedbush Securities отметили, что стоимость акций производителей электрокаров стала сильно зависеть от динамики цены цифрового золота.

Где выгоднее покупать биткоин? ТОП-5 бирж

Для безопасной и удобной покупки криптовалют с минимальной комиссией, мы подготовили рейтинг самых надежных и популярных криптовалютных бирж, которые поддерживают ввод и вывод средств в рублях, гривнах, долларах и евро.

Надежность площадки в первую очередь определяется объемом торгов и количеством пользователей. По всем ключевым метрикам, крупнейшей криптовалютной биржей в мире является Binance. Также Binance самая популярная криптобиржа в России и на территории СНГ, поскольку имеет наибольший оборот денежных средств и поддерживает переводы в рублях с банковских карт Visa/MasterCard и платёжных систем QIWI, Advcash, Payeer.

Специально для новичков мы подготовили подробный гайд: Как купить биткоин на криптобирже за рубли?

Рейтинг криптовалютных бирж :

#	Биржа:	Cайт:	Оценка:
1	Binance (выбор редакции)	https://binance.com	9.7
2	Bybit	https://bybit.com	7.5
3	OKEx	https://okex.com	7.1
4	Exmo	https://exmo.me	6.9
5	Huobi	https://huobi.com	6.5

Критерии по которым выставляется оценка в нашем рейтинге криптобирж :

• Надежность работы — стабильность доступа ко всем функциям платформы, включая бесперебойную торговлю, ввод и вывод средств, а также срок работы на рынке и суточный объем торгов.
• Комиссии – размер комиссии за торговые операции внутри площадки и вывод активов.
• Отзывы и поддержка – анализируем отзывы пользователей и качество работы техподдержки.
• Удобство интерфейса – оцениваем функциональность и интуитивность интерфейса, возможные ошибки и сбои при работе с биржей.
• Особенности платформы – наличие дополнительных возможностей — фьючерсы, опционы, стейкинг и прочее.
• Итоговая оценка – среднее число баллов по всем показателям, определяет место в рейтинге.

Дата публикации 04.03.2021
Подписывайтесь на новости криптовалютного рынка в Яндекс Мессенджер.
Поделитесь этим материалом в социальных сетях и оставьте свое мнение в комментариях ниже.

Источник

Banking on Bitcoin Available on Netflix: A Good Intro to Bitcoin in Need of a Sequel

The independent film Banking on Bitcoin, covering Bitcoin’s roots, its possible futures and its underlying technology, is now on Netflix. “Bitcoin is the most disruptive invention since the internet, and now an ideological battle is underway between fringe utopists and mainstream capitalism,” reads the Netflix news release. “The film shows the players who are defining how this technology will shape our lives.”

Banking on Bitcoin is a good film, professionally produced. On the hugely popular Netflix platform, the film will give many newcomers an understandable first introduction.

The overall impression is that this a good historic and ideological overview of Bitcoin’s first development phase but it’s in need of a sequel. From its cypherpunk roots and days of early adoption, the film focuses on the digital currency’s rocky relationship with the banks and regulatory bodies, setbacks like the fall of MtGox and the Silk Road, as well as some figures who were “first through the door,” like Charlie Shrem, Erik Voorhees and Gavin Andresen.

At the same time, Bitcoin and crypto enthusiasts are likely to find two shortcomings: First, the film dedicates too much time to stale old news like Silk Road and BitLicense, and not enough to new developments. Second, because it was first begun in late 2013 and wrapped up in the fall of 2016, the coverage of recent developments is very limited: The film essentially stops at the end of 2015.

Bitcoin Magazine reached out to the film’s director/writer/producer Christopher Cannucciari and associate producer Phillip Galinsky to find out more about the film’s background and their future plans.

What is your background, and what has been your role in the film?

Christopher Cannucciari: I had become interested in digital currency while I was producing a 2009 documentary in Kenya and some locals had introduced me to what would become mpesa. Kenya had just had a major crisis due to post-election violence of 2008. The banks had shut down and Kenyans came up with the novel idea of texting phone credits which could be used as money to pay for goods and services. Upon my return the thought of new ways to used technology as money stuck with me. Fast forward to 2013 and my interest in Bitcoin became so strong that I decided to bring my abilities as a filmmaker to it.

Phillip Galinsky: I’ve been involved in the film since the beginning when it was just Chris working in the role of Director and myself working in the role of Producer. Chris and I were working together on an unrelated project over a three-day shoot and I kept noticing (and occasionally mentioning to other members of the production team) that the price of bitcoin was skyrocketing.

Others working on the project seemed skeptical at first, but as the weekend drew on and the price nearly doubled, people became more interested. Chris and a number of other team members asked me to explain what bitcoin was and how it worked.

I was (and am) primarily interested in Bitcoin from a technological and moral consequentialist perspective, so I walked through the basic functions of blockchain technology, and attempted to explain how the capacity of blockchain technology to enable distributed, decentralized, censorship-resistant databases is a crucial enabling factor for development and implementation of the next generation of free and open global societies. My technical and somewhat arcane explanation turned out not to be the most effective way introduce the technology to the crew, and a number of people expressed interest in a gentler and easier to digest source of information about Bitcoin.

Chris in particular wanted to know more about Bitcoin due to previous experiences that showed him the power of technology as currency, and took note of the fact that, although Bitcoin had been around for about half a decade by then, most people still hadn’t heard of it and there were few high quality resources to be found that were targeted toward informing a general audience about the technology.

I introduced Chris to the NYC bitcoin community and we worked together on the many components of documentary film production.

What is the main message that viewers should take away?

Christopher Cannucciari: Before the public passes judgement on Bitcoin, they deserve to know where it came from, how it works and how it fits into society.

Bitcoin didn’t come from nothing, it came [off] the shoulders of the Cypherpunks. Bitcoin is a technology, and technologies are neither good nor evil, but rather [they ’re] accelerants. Society can use it as a tool however they see fit, and our hope is that those who wish to learn about Bitcoin will understand that it is there for them to participate as much as anyone.

The film doesn’t cover developments after the end of 2015 (price increases in 2017, investments, DAOs, spectacular ICOs, sidechains, Lightning Networks. ). I guess you had to take a long time for post processing and marketing (probably for lack of funds) between the end of shooting and the first release?

The story of Bitcoin is just too big to fit in a single film. Banking on Bitcoin is a primer for what Bitcoin is, where it came from and how it survived its initial challenges. As a primer, the audience can then dig in deeper and discover the many more complex stories.

We certainly could have tried to fit in many more stories, subjects and details, but the film would have lost its focus rather quickly. It was essential for us to honor the initiated while holding the attention of those who wanted an entry point to this amazing subject.

Vitalik Buterin appears in a couple of scenes but is never mentioned, and Ethereum is never mentioned. Why?

Christopher Cannucciari: I held interviews with Vitalik in Toronto, Wences Casares in Silicon Valley and even traveled to the Bitcoin Bowl in Florida. As much as I wish I could have kept these stories in the film, we had to keep focus on what was unfolding before us in New York.

Ethereum deserves its own story and perhaps we can find a way to tell that story in the future.

You often mention the tension between the original libertarian, crypto-anarchist spirit of Bitcoin and its new «sanitized» mainstream aspects, Ben Lawsky’s regulations and Blythe Masters’ Wall Street blockchains. What’s your own take?

Christopher Cannucciari: The Crypto scene in New York was amazingly vibrant and the state had a golden opportunity to foster it and give New York the same innovative energy Silicon Valley had in the 1980s. What happened instead is Bitcoin was eyed with suspicion and the regulations around it made it difficult for “garage” entrepreneurs to participate. It is now left to those who can afford to work with the regulators.

Phillip Galinsky: There are both positive and negative consequences of the adoption of blockchain technology by “Wall Street.” All blockchain development, both open and closed source, has the positive consequence of informing developers about the limitations and capacities of the technology. Open source endeavors produce the most accessible and immediately useful technologies to facilitate further blockchain invention and innovation. However, even closed-source development produces valuable knowledge about the possible uses of blockchain technology; for example, this white paper released by Blythe Masters’ firm Digital Asset Holdings which goes into great depth about one of the many possible uses of blockchain technology.

This is not to say that all blockchain based systems will be positive or bear normative value from a moral consequentialist perspective. Blockchain technology is incredibly powerful and will shape the future of human interaction and societal system architectures, for better or worse, and it is largely on the shoulder of developers to ensure that the blockchain is used to increase well-being in the world.

Is the end meant to suggest that Craig Wright is Satoshi? What is your own bet? Who is Satoshi?

Christopher Cannucciari: It’s very interesting how this is a sensitive issue. Craig Wright was presented in the same way as Dorian [Nakamoto] was. The carousel of Satoshi’s identity will continue; Wright will not be the last to come forward.

While Wright is most certainly not Satoshi, some have suggested that he was a drop for the real Satoshi. The timing was interesting, Wright was in need of capital to settle some big debts and all of a sudden he was in possession of some valuable, early Satoshi-era Bitcoins. For those who want to play the Satoshi game, I added this breadcrumb to keep the search on.

The Bitcoin/blockchain story is far from over. Are you working on a sequel to the film, and what role does blockchain technology play in your future work?

Phillip Galinsky: There will certainly be an ever-increasing wealth of material for filmmakers to cover in the blockchain space in coming years, as many of the most exciting developments in blockchain technology — self-executing contracts, oracles, distributed autonomous organizations, and most fascinating to me, blockchain-based societal control systems — are still in the nascent stages of development and implementation. Chris and I have discussed the possibility of making a sequel; however, we haven’t made any specific plans to do so at this point in time.

Источник